[Of  related interest: The  Zebra Project: The Blog Devoted to the Crimes of the  Genocidal Murder Cult, the nation of islam
  
 
    
      
        
        
    Twenty Years On: Summer of '01
    August  	12, 2021  	
    		        
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
    	There  	in the middle of this Mall is the Washington Monument, 555 feet  	high. But if we put a one in front of that 555 feet, we get 1555,  	the year that our first fathers landed on the shores of Jamestown,  	Virginia, as slaves. In the background is the Jefferson and Lincoln  	Memorial. Each one of these monuments is 19 feet high. Abraham  	Lincoln, the 16th president, Thomas Jefferson the third president,  	and 16 and three make 19 again. What is so deep about this number  	19? Why are we standing on the Capitol steps today? That number 19,  	when you have a nine, you have a womb that is pregnant, and when you  	have a one standing by the nine, it means that there's something  	secret that has to be unfolded...
  	  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
                     
  
      
      
This blog is dedicated to the necessarily collaborative job of unearthing and publicizing the truth about what may be the biggest case of organized, domestic mass murder in American history. This murder campaign, known, if at all, based on the San Francisco "Zebra murders," which were in fact one small part of it, was perpetrated on white Americans by the black supremacist terrorist group, the Nation of Islam.
Tuesday, August 17, 2021
Mark Steyn on Genocidal Cop-Killer, Louis Farrakhan
  	by  	Mark Steyn
      	A  	month from now, America will be marking the twentieth anniversary of  	9/11. The observances will be muted here, because it's too sad:  	we've lost the war, as the present recreation of the Saigon embassy  	evacuation in Kabul reminds us, somewhat crudely and obviously.  	Instead, ahead of that grim date, I thought we'd revisit August 2001  	with a few columns of mine from that last summer.
    	  As  	a scene-setter, we began a week ago with the summer of sharks. Here,  	from The  	Sunday Telegraph of  	August 6th 2001, is a column on Louis Farrakhan of the Nation of  	Islam - not the Islam that would briefly catch our eye a month  	later, but a kookier American "variant", as we now say. On  	the other hand, is Farrakhan really that kooky?  	Twenty years on, a 42-ton boulder has had to be removed from the  	University of Wisconsin at Madison because  	it's racist.
    	    	The  	boulder is two billion years old, and even the 1619 Project doesn't  	think American racism goes back that far. But in fact the boulder  	has been described as a "n*****-head" rock - just the  	once, a century ago. Yet that was sufficient to require the  	permanent removal of the rock. Sticks and stones may break my bones,  	but, even if they don't, appending harmful words to them can do even  	more damage. So now the racist rock is gone, and the healing can  	begin. Good luck with that.
    	    	By  	contrast, Minister Farrakhan's numerological riffs seem to belong to  	a more innocent age of American race nuttiness:
    	    	You  	can't blame Louis Farrakhan, the man behind the 1995 Million Man  	March in Washington, for seeking to have lifted the ban on his entry  	to the United Kingdom. And you can't blame Britain's High Court for  	last week's decision approving his petition. Indeed, the only wonder  	is that he was ever banned in the first place. After all, the Nation  	of Islam's leader can produce any number of glowing testimonials: "I  	have respect for him," said Al Gore's running mate, Joe  	Lieberman. Minister Farrakhan's message, said Jack Kemp, the 1996  	Republican Vice-Presidential nominee, is "wonderful."
      	This  	would be the message that Judaism is the "Synagogue of Satan"?  	Ah, well, let's not get hung up on details. Senator Lieberman is an  	Orthodox Jew, but that doesn't mean he can't "respect" a  	guy who thinks Hitler is "a great man" and advises Joe's  	crowd to try figuring out what they did to bug him. "Everybody  	talks about what Hitler did to you," Farrakhan pointed out in  	1994. "What did you do to Hitler? What made that man so mad at  	you?"
    	    	Senator  	Lieberman passed on that one, but did say recently that he feels  	sure the Minister "doesn't want to be a divisive figure."  	Thank goodness for that.
    	    	Thus,  	the complicated dynamic of American racial politics, of which  	Britain, for all its other woes, is blessedly free. It has black  	government ministers, black members of the House of Lords, black  	network news anchors, black pop stars and black sporting heroes, but  	no permanent elite of black grievance-mongers. On the sliding scale  	of African-American community leaders, Minister Farrakhan does not  	have the mainstream respectability of Jesse Jackson, the race  	industry's highest-earning shakedown artist, nor even of the  	Reverend Al Sharpton, the corpulent bouffant mob-inciting charlatan  	to whom Hillary Clinton, Al Gore and all other Democrat candidates  	must pay court. Yet arguably Farrakhan speaks for more of the black  	community than either of them.
    	    	According  	to one poll, 59 per cent of blacks think Farrakhan "speaks the  	truth." According to another, 40 per cent of the participants  	at his 1995 Million Man March said they had negative feelings about  	Jews. That's an impressive result, not because of the proportion in  	and of itself but because that's the number who felt sufficiently  	relaxed about their "negative feelings" to admit them  	cheerfully to The Washington Post. In fairness to the  	Nation of Islam, they don't just offend the Jew boys. At a "Black  	Holocaust Conference," one of Farrakhan's lieutenants, a  	"Professor of Egyptology," held up a painting of the Last  	Supper and called Christ's Disciples "a whole lot of white  	faggot boys".
    	    	When  	the High Court lifted the ban on Farrakhan, Fleet Street was roused  	to one of its instant fits of indignation. But to get steamed up  	about Farrakhan's bigotry is to miss the point: The Minister's  	status rests on blacks remaining a permanent victim class, and it's  	hard to be a victim unless someone's victimizing you. Farrakhan's  	attacks on Jews in particular and "white devils" in  	general are not just entirely logical, but also an excellent career  	move. The media have yet to record a single occasion when the  	Minister's diatribes before his large audiences have been met with a  	solitary boo. At Madison Square Garden, the line advising Jews to  	"remember, when God puts you in the ovens, it's forever"  	was, in fact, a big hit.
    	    	But  	let it go, I say. Objecting to Farrakhan as a bigot overlooks the  	more basic objection that he's a fruitcake. His Million Man March  	brought at least half that number to Washington, to stand in the  	street listening to a two-hour Farrakhan speech, in the course of  	which the former calypso singer went into a medley of his favourite  	numbers:
    	  	You  	don't have to be a numerologist to spot the flaw in this theory: One  	secret that's easily unfolded is that in 1555 there were no black  	slaves on the shores of Jamestown, and no permanent immigrant  	settlements anywhere in North America; Jamestown wasn't settled  	until 1607, and no slaves arrived until 1619. But if nine is the  	pregnant womb and one is the known number of Jesse Jackson's love  	children, then six minus one equals five, and $5 million is the  	interest-free loan Colonel Gaddafi gave Farrakhan to start his  	"Power Inc" company in 1985, and if you multiply 5 by 19  	you get 95, take away the 16, you're left with 79, which equals  	Farrakhan's two stately homes in the Chicago area plus his 77-acre  	rural retreat.
    	    	Coincidence?
    	    	Unlikely.
    	    	By  	the time Farrakhan had moved on to explain why the 440 cycles of the  	A tone in music were reminders of Egypt in the Eighteenth Dynasty,  	the US media knew they had a problem. The Minister has always had  	his whimsies -- he claims that once a month he's taken up into a  	spaceship orbiting the Earth to commune with Elijah Muhammed -- but  	faced with a man talking gibberish to the biggest gathering in  	Washington in decades, the American press froze. You can say a man's  	dangerous and demagogic, but, if you point out he's a loonytoon,  	what does that make the huge tide of people hanging on his every  	word? What does that make the popular black magazines like Ebony,  	which hailed him as one of the 20th century's "immortal  	giants", or Jet, which is as punctilious about his  	status as the Court Circular is about the Queen Mum's ("The  	Honorable Minister Louis Farrakhan Celebrates His 68th Birthday"  	ran the headline last month)? What does that make the leading black  	academics who were drooling all over the speech? It was, said  	Harvard's Cornel West, "depths of black love speaking to depths  	of black suffering." Black love, black suffering, we all love  	that storyline. But black nuttiness? No way.
    	    	So  	the major newspapers declined to report the Minister's numerological  	excursions, treating those portions of the speech like Victorian  	piano legs and obscuring them with discreet ellipses. The  	New York Times allowed that Mr. Farrakhan's address was  	"complex."
    	    	Racial  	politics in America is so toxic that white commentators can be  	respectful to, alarmed by or disappointed with a black leader but  	they cannot laugh at him. In the last week, every British national  	newspaper has gleefully mocked every Farrakhan idiocy; after decades  	of coverage, they've yet to be reported in the major American  	papers. What happens when it's deemed unseemly to point out how  	risible someone is? Farrakhan may never achieve his goal of a  	separate black nation, but he's already leading the way to a  	separate black reality, where the facts of whitey's world go  	unrecognized, and instead it's taken for granted that the AIDS virus  	was invented by the CIA to kill the black man.
    	    	Some  	on the right insist that, underneath the overheated rhetoric, he's  	an exemplary social conservative; some on the left admire him as a  	pioneer of Balkanized identity-group politics long before they were  	popular. But to all but the most partisan observers Minister  	Farrakhan presents a more basic conundrum: How nutso does an  	African-American community leader have to be before his fellow  	blacks hoot with derision and walk away?
    	    	~from The  	Sunday Telegraph, August 6th 2001.
    	  Many  	of Mark's pieces from this period can be found in his anthologies  	Mark Steyn from Head to Toe and The [Un]documented Mark  	Steyn, personally autographed copies of which are exclusively  	available from the SteynOnline  	bookstore.  	And, if you're a member of The  	Mark Steyn Club,  	don't forget to enter your promotional code at checkout for special  	member pricing.
    	  Please  	join Mark later today, Thursday, for the latest episode of his  	current Tale  	for Our Time -  	Jack London's Burning  	Daylight.
    	  
No comments:
Post a Comment